Logo Spacer Created by Opus

Kathy Sierra is So Wrong

Let me start by saying that I'm a regular reader of Kathy's blog, Creating Passionate Users. Most of what I read there is thougthful and insightful. But her post, Don't ask employees to be passionate about the company is just plain wrong and borderline ignorant (ignorant, as in "lacking knowledge, information or awareness). In her post she says:

People ask me, "How can I get our employees to be passionate about the company?" Wrong question. Passion for our employer, manager, current job? Irrelevant. Passion for our profession and the kind of work we do? Crucial.

Companies (at least the good ones), and the managers and leaders in those companies, play a pivotal role in the well-being of employees. First of all, companies make it possible for employees to do the work they're passionate about. Without those companies, many (probably most) of those people flat wouldn't be able to do the work they're passionate about.

Second, please remember the work of a single person seldom (if ever) "creates a passionate user". Passionate users emanate from the cummulative work of many people, from the work of the company. It's the end product of the company that changes the life of the user. Why is that important to the well-being of the employee? Because human beings yearn to be a part of something larger than themselves - that's one of the critical ways they find meaning. Sometimes there isn't much meaning in the laying of a single brick - but there is immense meaning in the building of the cathedral. Companies give employees an opportunity to be part of something larger than themselves - and that is worthy of passion!

Finally (although I COULD go on for days), companies and managers (again, the good ones) provide emotional support and physical resources employees need to learn and grow. And to feel cared about. Most human beings thrive on praise and recognition - managers provide that recognition and praise. Most human beings thrive when they have an opportunity to learn and grow - companies regularly provide those opportunities. Most human beings thrive through social contact - and that is the essence of a company.

Kathy is wrong. There is little that is more relevant than how passionate employees are about their company, their leaders and their managers. If some significant segment of a company's employees aren't passionate about the company, one of two circumstances exist: leadership is deficient or employees are blindly narcissistic.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345b925869e200d834f9cd9c53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference this post

Comments

Hey there jack,
I'm always going to listen to what you have to say, so I'm glad it was YOU with a headline like that ; )

I'm not sure we're too far apart in our view on this, but I can see all the places I didn't make my goal clear. So, I'm finding it hard to disagree with much of what you said. I think it's more a matter of how a company tries to achieve "passionate employees". I suppose my real point is more like, "Help your employees do the work they're passionate about (the get out of their way thing, which is enabled by the things you mentioned -- entirely through the support of the company), and the rest takes care of itself. Employees in this model who are given the space and support for doing their best work can't *help* but feel passion for the company.

At the bottom of my post, I mentioned the software metaphor again -- when I talk to people about how to create passionate users for their products, we always take the approach that people are almost never truly passionate about a physical product or company that makes it -- they are passionate about something this company/product *enables*, but the end result is the same -- the happy user maps that passion onto the company--as the psychologists would call it -- attributing the passion for the *thing they're passionate about* to the company/product that provided that.

So, while I do agree that passion for the company IS important, I don't think the way to get it is by asking or expecting it. Very few people really *are* truly passionate about a company... but will be unable to separate the passion they have for the thing the company enables from passion for the company itself. It's about doing thing B to achieve thing A, where "B" is "supporting the employee in enabling them to do their best work at the thing they're passionate about, and "A" is "passion for the company itself."

Granted, I don't try to apply any of this to the kinds of work people feel no passion for, although I believe it's possible to feel something *kind of* like passion for even the most mundane-seeming jobs, under the right circumstances... much as FLOW talks about where even an assembly-line employee can find both challenge and a desire to build knowledge and skills.

Anyway, thanks so much for posting this. It's such a huge important topic, and I missed some really important things.

One more thing... it means a great deal to me that while you really do like the blog (most of the time), you were still willing to be vocal about your disagreement with me on this. It's the only way I'm ever going to improve...

Many people use tramadol.
But watch those videos!
url

Do not buy this drug tramadol!
url

Look at this video of the young girl takes tramadol!
url

Protect your children from this!
http://beklo.com/?w=tramadolpills

Post a Comment

Name:
Email:
URL:
Comment:
    

Buy the Book

Book Cover The Wisdom of the Flying Pig


Buy from Amazon.com